A UNEPS ‘White Paper’ Launched in Washington, DC
A UN Emergency Peace Service: One Step Towards Effective Genocide Prevention
Hosted by the Partnership for Effective Peacekeeping and Citizens for Global Solutions
On May 27 th 2008, Citizens for Global Solutions and Global Action to Prevent War led a panel discussion focused on increasing the effectiveness of UN and regional genocide prevention efforts. Hosted by the Partnership for Effective Peacekeeping (PEP), the purpose of the event was to introduce and discuss a White Paper produced by Citizens for Global Solutions entitled, “A UN Emergency Peace Service: One Step Towards Effective Genocide Prevention.”
The panel was led by Don Kraus (CEO of Citizens for Global Solutions) and included Robert Zuber of GAPW and Mark Malan of the Peacebuilding Unit of Refugees International. The event chair was Kevin Bacon (Director of Refugees International).

Don Kraus presented the White Paper that he and his CGS colleagues (in cooperation with GAPW) prepared for the Albright/Cohen Genocide Prevention Task Force. Don’s Power Point presentation focused on current problems in peacekeeping missions that impact the speed of deployment as well as training, accountability and capacity issues. He pointed out that “over the past 15 years, the UN has taken on average, 46 days to begin the deployment of peacekeepers and 13 months to fully staff missions…” He also highlighted the collaborative development of a UN Emergency Peace Service (UNEPS) as both a tool to fill this deployment gap and as a complementary, integrated service to assist the UN and regional organizations in achieving effective genocide prevention. Don noted the growing support for UNEPS from governments, UN officials and civil society organizations worldwide.
Mark Malan emphasized that the notion of standing capacity is enshrined within the UN Charter and has been promoted by many individuals and organization. It is now a case of ‘marketing’ the idea effectively, coupling the military and civilian components of UNEPS in such a way to help ensure that this new tool is seen as complementary and ‘non-threatening’ to Member States as possible.
Robert Zuber highlighted additional components of the UNEPS proposal including its strong gender focus, its robust non-military components, and the extent to which UNEPS seeks to integrate the security concerns of the ‘global south.’ He also noted that the proposal is still a ‘work-in-progress’ and must remain flexible and responsive. Robert outlined the current burdens on DPKO and the need for tools such as UNEPS to improve the viability and credibility of peacekeeping operations.
Ken Bacon questioned how sufficient political will for the UNEPS proposal can be generated and how the ‘global south’ should best be engaged in the process of refining and promoting the proposal.